True, the RZ generally has better lenses, and oftentimes, it's cheaper, and it even has the 110mm f/2.8. I rarely use the 110mm wide open because of the maximum shutter speed, so it doesn’t often matter how tastefully shallow the depth of field is. Not to be redundant with the above lists, but the RZ is substantially more expensive than the RB and without much to explain why. Still, though, there are pros and cons for each of the two cameras that make it difficult to suggest one over the other for everyone. Why? They are both made by the same manufacturer, had more than a decade of overlap in their production dates, and are built in a very similar style. They have a habit of being troublesome in extreme conditions (mine has seized up on two separate occasions now when hiking in temperatures well below freezing)Īs you may have noticed, it is difficult to talk about the RZ without mentioning its sibling, the RB.Not all mechanical (electronic leaf shutters).Price: it’s considerably more expensive than the RB and costs a lot overall.6x7 format - easily my favorite of medium format.Accessories are more common and generally less expensive than the same accessories for the RB.Many of the lenses are considerably cheaper than their RB counterparts.Updated lenses over most of the RB lenses (sans a few K/L lenses).As such, I can still use my 90mm f/3.8 C and 180mm f/4.5 K/L lenses on my RZ without a hitch.
#How to cjange lens on mamiya 7 ii free#
In addition, with the RZ, you are free to use RB lenses too, which is possibly the best part of shooting the RZ. Both lenses are quite lovely and are capable of making fantastic images. So far, my collection has only included the 65mm f/4 and the legendary 110mm f/2.8. They are sharp as a tack and quite contrasty. Though I don’t have the AE prism yet, it’s on my list to possibly pick up when I find one at a decent price, which would allow for shooting in aperture priority.Īll lenses for the Mamiya RZ67 are fantastic. With that said, however, there were only a couple of lenses made for use with the tilt-shift adapter specifically, while some other lenses could still be used for relatively close focusing, but I’m not sure what would happen in the way of vignetting. Most notably, the RZ has a tilt-shift adapter to make for some interesting portrait sessions akin to the capabilities of a large-format camera. The Mamiya RB67 had so many accessories offered, but the RZ67 puts it to shame in a few ways. In an improvement in design, the film back does not utilize light seals, meaning that it is not susceptible to the same sort of issues that the RB67 (Pro and Pro-S models) had, although the RB67 Pro-SD had a similar design for the backs.
It’s a little lighter than the RB67, and while it may be just as durable, it doesn’t give off quite the same level of confidence in its build quality. It has the style, updated functionality, and format of the RB67 while boasting an exterior aesthetic as the 645 Pro-TL.
#How to cjange lens on mamiya 7 ii pro#
In all honesty, I figured that one day I would want to make the switch anyhow since I could build out my RB kit and still make use of it on an RZ, while the converse is not true.Īlready owning and loving a Mamiya RB67 and a Mamiya 645 Pro TL, the RZ67 feels like the perfect blend of these two cameras. So, at the time that I started looking for a replacement back, I decided to just make the switch to the RZ system. This issue was only compounded by the fact that lenses, waist-level finders, and other accessories for the RB system are generally harder to come by and more expensive when you can find them. I picked up the RZ67 in 2020 when the only 6x7 back on my RB started giving me trouble with pretty regular light leaks (though now I believe this was actually due to a mistake with the lab processing it, but that’s neither here nor there at this point) and the cost of a back for the RB was actually higher than a back for the RZ.
0 kommentar(er)
